gretchening

6Oct/110

Gene Luen Yang Lecture

I was going to be all meta and make a comic-style journal entry about the lecture, but I've got too much art on my plate already, so instead I'll just write an old-fashioned post!

GENE LUEN YANG HOW ARE YOU SO AMAZING. He was so nice and genial, funny and smart! I mean, I have a certain background as an indie comics reader, so I expected his lecture to cover a lot of familiar ground, but I found myself FASCINATED by his discussion of the divergent roots of converging American and Japanese comic styles and creators, especially given the topic of my last post. I didn't know the thing about Tezuka getting the classic anime eyes idea from Bambi, for instance. My epic braincrush on Yang has grown exponentially.

I do have a niggling disagreement with Yang about how awesome Scott McCloud is. I recently read Making Comics and, while that book is five years old and a lot has happened in those intervening years in terms of manga being embraced by American audiences, his chapter on manga struck me as... appropriative? Idealistic? I'm not sure, but it left me feeling a bit cold after having appreciated quite a lot of the practical advice he gives in the bulk of the book. Of course, a person doesn't have to be perfect in order to be influential, and there are certainly worse people Yang could have dressed as for Halloween (which had me laughing SO HARD).

I really appreciated the time Yang spent on his personal journey around comics and culture, too. Some of the things he said resonated (I also got flak from teachers in grade school for reading comics!), and some of it was bringing a perspective I don't have as a white American. I like his approach to finding harmony and bridging apparent divides--it certainly works well for him, judging by his work.

After the lecture I ducked back out into the lobby where we were selling the books and found my boss sitting there reading American Born Chinese. My boss has always been one of those people who adamantly refuses to give comics a try--even ones that are super relevant and beloved by the bookstore's core community, like Alison Bechdel's work! But here she was, reading the comic book, and she looks up and says in a totally shocked voice, 'This is really good!' Yes, yes it is! What have I been telling you for years, now? It was like this great little moment supporting that shift Yang spoke about of how denigrated comics as a form was and how it's finally gaining some respectability as worthwhile literature in recent years. I think Yang is totally right that right now is an excellent time for comics.

Also, on a shallow note, OMG AVATAR COMICS. That show is quite literally one of my favorite shows ever, and I can never get enough of Aang and the gang, and Yang is one of the few writers I would trust completely to continue the series and adapt it well to the medium. Often when you get comics continuations of shows it feels like a shill by the company to squeeze more out of a property without investing in the heavy costs of filming a show anymore, with a few exceptions. In those cases the art might be lacking or the stories and presentation simply ill-adapted to the comics medium, but I trust Yang to do a fabulous job, even more so after hearing his lecture and the depth of his knowledge and appreciation for both American and Asian comics and comics histories. Avatar is such a surprisingly well-done merging of American animation with some anime influences and Asian-styed secondary fantasy world/plot that, shockingly, seems to respect and honor the Asian influence rather than come off as appropriative. It's a remarkable piece of television and it has a devoted fanbase and, happily, will now enjoy a future in good hands in a new medium, as well as a sequel show!

In conclusion, and just because I love it and I'm all excited about the comic now, one of my favorite Avatar fanvids!

2Oct/110

My Little Pony and Vidding Cultures/Audiences

This My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic fanvid got linked all over my Twitter feed, and I love it enough that I had to go and watch the first few episodes of the show. I was pleasantly surprised, both by the vid and the show! I think from a perspective of gender representation (and the diversity of same! not everything is pink bows--but pink bows aren't denigrated, either. It is really wonderful) the show is unusually top notch, and it's popular enough to make it noteworthy in terms of this class. I also think it's important in terms of the website project I'm beginning to think about--to keep in mind that there are entire cultures built around pretty sophisticated creative fan responses to texts, and that our little blog sites are not going to succeed if we pretend they exist in a safe contained vacuum.

I don't follow YouTube vidding culture as much as I follow blog-based fanvids (though many of the vidders I follow also crosspost their work to YouTube, the culture of commentary and critique and recommendation I am primarily involved with happens on blogging platforms like livejournal.com), and most of the vidders whose work I do follow vid live-action sources, usually television shows that already have a significant fan following. I have been a co-curator of the Vid Party at WisCon, which has meant I've been involved in some interesting discussions around live media vidding cultures and anime music video (AMV) cultures. For a brief overview, see the Fanlore article on AMVs. Without getting into the very different cultures of interaction and commentary and platform and just looking at the fan products themselves, in general (but with many exceptions!) live action media fanvids tend to focus on emotions, relationships, the personal arcs of characters, and/or creating new narratives from canon sources, while AMVs tend to focus more on technical mastery of effects, layers, and original animation to create a sensory experience that is often more abstract than narrative. Creators of media fanvids tend to skew overwhelmingly female, AMV creators tend toward male.

For reference to live action vids, and also because I think it's an interesting blend of skills drawn directly or indirectly from both communities, here is a Harry Potter fanvid we showed at the event I helped organize in May which includes source from the first 7 films and reflects a lot of the emotional connection and fannish nostalgia about the impending final film, as well as a certain amount of technical skill in the use of layers and effects, which are becoming more widely accessible as the software programs become more sophisticated and the culture of remix video creators gets larger and more complex in terms of skill, creativity and experimentation, and mentorship:

Which brings me back to the My Little Pony fanvid! This show, ostensibly for young children, has been remarkably popular among adults, including a significant male contingent known as 'bronies' (which is very unusual, especially considering the target demographic for this show is little girls). Not unsurprisingly, My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (MLP:FIM) is a very popular fandom for fanvidding, and even has its own acronym (PMVs--Pony Music Videos). What I find interesting is that these PMV vidders seem to take conventions from media fanvidding and amvs, but don't necessarily come from either background conceptually. For instance, the "Fabulous Bringjoys" vidder paid attention to synching characters' mouth movements with lyrics, a concern highly valued/critiqued in AMV circles but almost completely ignored in live action vidding communities. However, the focus on character work and the detailed interplay between the footage and the lyrics harks more toward live action vidding values. The animation is mostly unedited apart from clipping, as well--the lack of effects and the focus on more literal vs. abstract narratives make me read this as more a live action vid than an AMV.

This great thing about this vid in particular is that it sets up what should be an incongruity--the song is a rock song by an all-male American band (My Chemical Romance), and the official music video and album describe a gritty, violent sci-fi post-apocalyptic world reminiscent of Mad Max or Blade Runner. To set pretty sparkly ponies to this song should be a straight up parody, but it actually seems to function on a more interesting level, pulling out a narrative from the video source of strong, empowered, courageous and personally diverse pony characters standing up against enemies and fighting and sacrificing for causes they believe in (a narrative thread which is borne out by the canon source). In that sense, the song upends the viewer because it actually works on a straightforward level--showcasing the ways in which the pony characters are powerful and committed as opposed to the gendered stereotypes we might assume about their stories based on the color palette and obvious intended audience for the show. Narratively, it's NOT a stereotypical 'girl' show and cannot thus be 'dismissed' (though I feel the need to insert a comment here about why we feel the NEED to dismiss 'girl things', or that we as a culture automatically expect girls to be interested in pink non-threatening characters and situations)--sexism is alive and well, and this vid does a pretty good job of highlighting that in a peculiarly performative and fun way.

The whole My Little Pony phenomenon is kind of heartening from a feminist perspective--after watching the first few episodes I clicked around YouTube and found several filmed class presentations of bronies giving talks about the show, and seeing teenaged/early 20-year-old guys talk earnestly about the positive aspects of a cast of almost entirely female characters is really heartening.

The question of audience, though, is really tricky for me, especially in context of LIS629 and focusing on the needs of children in a way I don't habitually do. Obviously the online fannish presence for this show is overwhelmingly adult, and possibly majority male. What, then, about the INTENDED audience--little girls? Kids who want to explore transmedia possibilities are more likely than not to find related content that's not appropriate for or intended for them, simply because adult males already have significant presence in most internet spaces, and their access to technology and skill to use it effectively mean that adult creations like this fanvid are more likely to get widespread interest than something created by a ten-year-old and posted to youtube about their favorite show. A cursory googling reveals a great deal of marketing aimed at children, with the only significant web space intended specifically for kids being the Hasbro website, which is great for some kinds of experience but for more active/creative things, you are not likely to find a platform supportive of remix video content or other user generated content like fanfiction or fanart.

Moreover, since so much remix video work (or, to extend the question, fan-fiction and fanart) is self-taught or mentored between amateurs in order to gain the technical skills necessary, as well as entry into one of many cultures surrounding this form of creative expression and commentary, and that kind of thing is less likely to happen on company-sponsored sites. I think it's important for kids to have spaces to meet one another and help each other gain skills, not only technical skills but also collaborative and critical, active engagement skills, that will serve them well as media consumers. In a fandom like MLP:FIM, where is the appropriate space for children to create that community?

7Dec/090

Remix Culture and Vidding Linklist

Here are links to all of the source footage from my video.

Siva Vaidhyanathan's speech to Columbia University students as part of their Open Source Culture Lecture series, 'Copyrights and Copywrongs"

Alan Brodsky's interview with Francesca Coppa, "We Are Creators, Too"

Lawrence Lessig's TED talk, "How creativity is being strangled by the law"

Francesca Coppa's 24/7 DIY Video Summit talk, "A Genealogy of Vidding" (which was also written by Laura Shapiro and introduced by Henry Jenkins):

Eric Faden's "A Fair(y) Use Tale", which remixes copyright giant Disney's overprotected content into an educational short film about copyright and fair use:

"Us" by lim.


"Remix Culture vs the DMCA"
(Rebecca Tushnet audio). I think this is by the Electronic Frontier Foundation
.

Footage from the documentary "Rip! A Remix Manifesto", which you can download. Parts of it are also available on YouTube.

"Closer" by T. Jonesy and Killa. [Note: This includes some adult material and also implied sexual violence]

"Chad Vader" by Aaron Yonda and Matt Sloan. The clips I used here are taken from "Remix Culture: The Early Years", but you can see more of the actual series at their website.

Francesca Coppa and Henry Jenkins talk about fan vids.

"Shatner of the Mount"
by Fall on Your Sword--a remix of an interview Shatner gave for Star Trek V (in which Captain Kirk tries to climb Yosemite).

I also included the songs "Make Your Own Kind of Music" by the Mamas and the Papas and "Fight the Power" by Public Enemy

Tagged as: No Comments
5Dec/090

Vidding History

Oh wow, why did nobody show me this before?!? The OTW's own Francesca Coppa gives a talk on the geneaology of vidding, and the whole thing is available on Youtube, with a kind intro by Henry Jenkins. I've read an article by her with the same title or similar, but it's a whole nother thing to see her talk about it. Wow I love this! SHE IS SO AWESOME.

Tagged as: No Comments
11Nov/090

Rip! A Remix Manifesto

The other night I had friends over to watch Rip! A Remix Manifesto, which I'd gotten from Netflix.

I was unimpressed. There were some arguments I appreciated, a few points I hadn't seen yet, but on the whole it wasn't a very comprehensive piece.

I am, of course, on board with the central premise of the film--that copyright laws are restrictive and are damaging to free expression and serving to quash creativity, not foster and promote it. I don't think it's ideal to do away with copyright altogether, but I do think the laws as they stand are excessive, and there should be more protections for fair use and transformative work, and some attention to the right of the public to engage with collective culture and entertainment in an active way.

My biggest problem with the movie was how limited it was in scope, especially with regard to race and gender. It seemed to assume from the outset that we-the-viewer already agree with him (which, as it happens, I mostly do), I don't see it doing much to sway someone who didn't already agree (think Michael Moore). It also focused way too much on one (white) performer, Girltalk (I hate that name on a straight boy) who was a pal of the filmmaker's. It was a documentary that focused primarily on remixing music (with nod to film remix basically inasmuch as it applied to the making of this documentary itself, and almost nothing about print remix). He didn't talk about modern hip hop or rap at all, and the only mentions of musical communities of people of color were the old blues guys (Muddy Waters etc.) and modern Brazil. There were almost no women in the movie--there was the copyright office lady who was basically set up to be laughed down, and there was Girltalk's girlfriend whose only comments in the film were about when Girltalk doesn't wear pants. We also saw one woman later on in the film who'd been sued for downloading music, so at least her story was relevant even if it was all about her as a victim of the system, rather than an active participant in remix culture. Because obviously women and people of color aren't creative enough to be included in this movie as artists. /sarcasm

It just wasn't a very nuanced argument, and ignored issues of race and gender--and we all know how I feel about that.

I'm also reading Siva Vaidhyanathan's Copyrights and Copywrongs, and I think I'm going to use that as my book for this class, and remix Rip! to a) bring attention to the people of color and women who ARE artists worthy of celebration (the book does mention several hip hop and rap artists that I'll mix in), and b) bring in the more sophisticated arguments Vaidhyanathan is making. So, that will be my class vid.

Tagged as: , No Comments
28Oct/090

iPod Vids!

I finally sat down this morning and figured out how to get vids onto my iPod touch! \o/

I'm writing it here because it took me a while to figure out. I looked at several google hits, most of which said "use Handbrake" or "buy my product", but weren't very specific. I've used Handbrake before and like it, so I wasted some time fussing with the controls a bit and had some limited success with converting my vids to an iPod-friendly format.

I finally realized that Handbrake has a preset feature, because I don't catch on to obvious things, since I believe it to be Much Harder than it actually is. It isn't hard at all! Anyhow, perhaps you are new to this stuff, too, and might appreciate being spared the google searches and frustrating dithering that I did this morning before I got it.

To get vids on your iPod using Handbrake:
1) download Handbrake if you don't have it (it is open source and free)
2) install the program
3)open Handbrake
4) click "toggle presets" in the top right corner of Handbrake, and under the "Apple" heading, choose the type of iPod you have. (if you have a non-Apple mp3 player I think you can use 'universal', though I am not certain)
5) click "Source" at the top, open the file you wish to convert, and then hit "play". It will start encoding and save the converted file to your desktop.
6) If you want several films converted, put them in the queue (do step 5 but hit "add to queue" instead of "play").
7) make a playlist in iTunes (or whatever program you use), and drop the converted files in. Make sure you tell you iPod to sync to that folder.
8) I also had to change the preset to "sync all movies", because mine defaulted to only putting the 10 most recently added videos on my iPod.

I am an utter novice about most of this stuff, so I didn't play with any of the other business on Handbrake, I just let its preset go ahead for me.

Tagged as: No Comments
24Sep/090

Glee

I accidentally watched Glee last night, and yes, I do in fact regret it.

I am SO over the manipulative women in this show! I count FIVE in this episode alone! That's almost all the women with speaking parts! We still have the Hysterical Pregnancy Wife, also her conniving pregnancy coach/doula, we have Rachel threatening to quit if she doesn't get the lead (again), we've got Sue the cheerleading coach who uses images of the principal wearing compression hose (nevermind that it's for an airline commercial and not a sexual context at all) to blackmail him, and we have the pregnant Celibacy Club cheerleader, who tells her nice boyfriend it's his (even though they've never had sex) because he'd be a better father than his best friend, the ACTUAL father. UUUUUUUUUGH. These are horrible portrayals of all kinds of women--popular girls, competitive women, and hysterical wives. The redeeming moments were barely that, though I'll admit to liking Kurt's coming out scene and, well, pretty much all of his and Kim's scenes ever. That wasn't enough to make up for how disgusted I felt by the end of it. Also, not NEARLY enough Mercedes.

STILL not watching you, show.

I also read Convergence Culture by Henry Jenkins, and have some things to say about it. I enjoyed it but have some serious reservations about how it doesn't incorporate gender or (especially) race or class into its analysis, and it definitely felt in a lot of places like a how-to-market-to-the-new-online-audiences-for-giant-corporations, which...um. I also think he wasn't thorough in his exploration of examples, and I felt like the examples he uses were chosen because they highlight his agenda, and he doesn't explore them on their own terms. This was most obvious to me with how he used Harry Potter fanfiction to highlight how children are learning new media literacy skills through play... but there's a lot more to fannish culture than just kids getting educated, and I think his analysis fell down right there.

But! Having read this book gave me great background for two recent things I've read and recommend to you now, including several essays in Cinema Journal devoted to vidding and fandom. It's not yet available online, but check your local academic library. Kristina Busse's introduction is fantastic. There are great articles in there about particular vids (Francesca Coppa takes on A Fannish Taxonomy of Hotness and Alexis Lothian discusses 's breathtaking vid Us in terms of media piracy, and I really loved Julie Levin Russo's "User-Penetrated Content: Fan Video in the Age of Convergence" for its ideas, analysis, and delightfully playful style.

   

Pages

Categories

Blogroll

Archive

Meta